Re: ispell/hunspell imprecision in error message
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ispell/hunspell imprecision in error message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6356.1469542023@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ispell/hunspell imprecision in error message (Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > On 25.07.2016 19:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> But I found that this actually talks about Hunspell format dictionaries. >> (So the man page is hunspell(5) as opposed to ispell(5).) While as far >> as the tsearch interfaces are concerned, those two are lumped together, >> should we not change the error message to refer to Hunspell? > As I understand, this error message refers to the Ispell dictionary > template. This template can use various dictionary formats. Which is > confusing. Maybe would be better to change dictionary template name. But > it can break backward compatibility... I think the error message has to refer to the ispell dictionary type by its assigned name, otherwise you'll just create even more confusion. (In other words, I read the message as talking about PG's ispell dictionary code, not about somebody else's ispell man file.) The right place to explain that ispell accepts hunspell-formatted files, or to link to specifications of what that means, is in the documentation. Section 12.6.5 already says that, but maybe it could be expanded/rewritten a little. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: