Re: linked list rewrite
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: linked list rewrite |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 633F3792-7D55-11D8-8EB3-000A95AB279E@samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: linked list rewrite (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: linked list rewrite
Re: linked list rewrite |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23-Mar-04, at 10:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > How do you mean it's no longer the case? ListCell looks exactly like a > cons cell to me. Sorry, thinko on my part. I meant to say that lcons() is a Lispy name, which suggests a Lispy implementation. This is no longer the case. While lcons() isn't that bad of a name, I think it is more confusing than it is helpful. It just doesn't strike me that "construction" is a very useful way to talk about what this operation is actually doing, and is asymmetric with lappend() for no good reason. The operation is "prepending" an element to an existing list, so why not give it a name that reflects that? -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: