Re: PG 11 feature count
От | Gavin Flower |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG 11 feature count |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6305dfd0-9ddd-6bc3-81bf-692692f793f3@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PG 11 feature count (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/05/18 11:29, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I regularly track the number of items documented in each major release. > I use the attached script. You might be surprised to learn that PG 11 > has the lowest feature count of any release back through 7.4: > > 7.4 280 > 8.0 238 > 8.1 187 > 8.2 230 > 8.3 237 > 8.4 330 > 9.0 252 > 9.1 213 > 9.2 250 > 9.3 187 > 9.4 217 > 9.5 200 > 9.6 220 > 10 194 > 11 167 > > I try to use the same criteria in choosing items each year, though I > certainly am not perfectly accurate. > > One reason the PG 11 count is lower is because the the major items for > this release are not listed at the top yet, but that is only around six > items. > I wonder what the ranking would be in terms of: 1. Complexity 2. Usefulness 3. Lines-of-Code 4. ... Suspect Lines-of-code is the one most easily measured, but the least useful! Whereas: Usefulness is probably the most valuable, but the most difficult to measure -- for obvious reasons... Cheers, Gavin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: