Re: uintptr_t for Datum
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: uintptr_t for Datum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 630.1262277648@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | uintptr_t for Datum (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: uintptr_t for Datum
Re: uintptr_t for Datum |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > Attached patch is the part of the win64 patch that changes Datum to be > uintptr_t, and associated changes, with only very minor changes from > me. It also includes autoconf tests that I tricked Bruce into fixing > for me :-) > Comments? This is a joke no? Where's the logic to provide a definition of intptr_t if the platform fails to? The lack of attention to updating the comments about Datum doesn't give me a warm feeling either. BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: