Re: [GENERAL] Logical replication

On 05/01/2017 09:34 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 05/01/2017 09:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 5/1/17 10:32, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2017 09:07 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>>> I have started looking at the logical replication feature in Postgres
>>>> 10. One thing I have no been able to determine is the interoperability
>>>> between it and
>>>> pglogical(www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/). I
>>>> know the one is derived from the other, what I can not find is
>>>> whether a
>>>> Postgres 9.4 instance with the pglogical extension installed can
>>>> communicate with a Postgres 10 instance using the built in code?
>>
>>> Some testing says the answer is no:
>>
>> correct
>>
>>> If I am correct, this means from 9.4 <--> 10 and points in between you
>>> would need to use the pglogical extension on both ends.
>>
>> correct
>>
>>> Going from 10
>>> --> you could use the builtin logical replication. This leads to another
>>> question. Is is possible to use both at the same time?:
>>>
>>> 9.4       --->   10(instance 1)    ---> 10(instance 2)
>>> pglogical        pglogical
>>>                   builtin                builtin
>>
>> That is possible.
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
>>
>> pglogical will continue to exist, so you can also keep using it if you
>> already have it.
>>
>
> I tried building the pglogical extension against Postgres 10 and it
> seems that is not possible yet, which tracks the information on the
> pglogical page:
>
> https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/pglogical-installation-instructions/
>
>
> I went to the GitHub repo:
>
> https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pglogical
>
> and did not see anything that looks ready for Postgres 10.
>
> Am I missing something or is this something for the future?

The present as of now:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH%2BGA0o5B89eDJjoKO-yN%3DXQEsC%2BpA2n9LuQPun0EAz9fVcUEA%40mail.gmail.com


>
>
>
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com