Re: psql feature thought
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql feature thought |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6296.1147756652@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql feature thought (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql feature thought
Re: psql feature thought Re: psql feature thought |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes: > What use case are you envisioning? Just saving ... *counts ... 14 > keystrokes in this case? (I'm not saying there *isn't* a use case. I > just don't see a big benefit here.) Quite aside from the compatibility and how-useful-is-it-really arguments, I think this'd be a bad idea in the abstract. SQL is not one of those languages that assigns semantic significance to the shape of whitespace [1]. We should NOT introduce any such concept into psql, because it'd fundamentally break the lexical structure of the language. To take just one example of the difficulties you'd get into, consider select 1; select 2; select 3; How many transactions is that exactly? And on what grounds are you deciding? (No, I don't like python. Why do you ask? ;-)) regards, tom lane [1] Mostly. There's the infamous continued-string-literal construct...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: