Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6258.1255027975@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING
Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: >> BTW what was the conclusion of the idea about having three separate >> nodes Insert, Delete, Update instead of a single Dml node? > If we stick with a single node type then I'd suggest calling it > something like ModifyTable. I'm starting to work on this patch now. After looking at it a bit, it seems to me that keeping it as one node is probably marginally preferable to making three nodes; but I still do not like the "Dml" name. Does anyone have a problem with the ModifyTable suggestion, or a better idea? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: