Re: Different compression methods for FPI
От | Andrey Borodin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Different compression methods for FPI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6216BFD5-EFE8-4BB4-8939-FFD9434D5612@yandex-team.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Different compression methods for FPI (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 17 июня 2021 г., в 11:57, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> написал(а): > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:45:37AM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote: >> Konstantin, Daniil and Justin are working on compressing libpq >> [0]. That would make walsender compress WAL automatically. >> And we (at least I and Dan) are inclined to work on compressing >> on-disk WAL as soon as libpq compression will be committed. > > What's the relationship between libpq and WAL? walsender transmit WAL over regular protocol. Compressing libpq leads to huge decrease of cross-datacenter traffic of HAclusters. In fact that's the reason why Daniil is working on libpq compression [0]. But that's matter of other thread. Best regards, Andrey Borodin. [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/161609580905.28624.5304095609680400810.pgcf%40coridan.postgresql.org#be6bc3ba77ff8a293b1816f4841c59ef
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: