Re: About inheritance
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: About inheritance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6211.1093196249@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | About inheritance (Ioannis Theoharis <theohari@ics.forth.gr>) |
Ответы |
Prefetch children
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Ioannis Theoharis <theohari@ics.forth.gr> writes: > I expekt to find the same plans because in both cases there is a union to > be done, but i see that in second case there is an additional call to a > routine. I meen the 'Subquery Scan "*SELECT* X"' The subquery scan step is in there because in a UNION construct, there may be a need to do transformations on the data before it can be unioned. For instance you are allowed to UNION an int4 and an int8 column, in which case the int4 values have to be promoted to int8 after they come out of the subplan. In the particular case you are showing, the subquery scan steps aren't really doing anything, but AFAIR the planner does not bother to optimize them out. I'd be pretty surprised if they chew up any meaningful amount of runtime. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: