Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6204.1034827551@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > As of current CVS, PL/Perl doesn't seem to compile against Perl 5.8. Builds fine on HPUX 10.20 with Perl 5.8.0 and gcc 2.95.3. > There's a thread about a similar topic on p5p: > http://archive.develooper.com/perl5-porters@perl.org/msg75480.html This thread makes it sound like it's Perl's problem not ours ... > The thread suggests a trivial fix: adding -D_GNU_SOURCE to the CFLAGS > for the affected files. I checked, and this gets PL/Perl to compile > correctly. That doesn't seem like the right fix, though. In view of opposing comments like http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2002-03/msg01452.html I think we should stay out of this. It is not our business to get random Perl code to compile on random OS installations, and certainly not our business to interject random symbol definitions that might well break whatever solution the Perl guys themselves decide on. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: