Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 62013cd7-b2a6-477e-b8dd-9a27be3073e0@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/20/23 16:41, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2023-11-20 15:56:19 -0400, David Steele wrote: >> I understand this is an option -- but does it need to be? What is the >> benefit of excluding the manifest? > > It's not free to create the manifest, particularly if checksums are enabled. It's virtually free, even with the basic CRCs. Anyway, would you really want a backup without a manifest? How would you know something is missing? In particular, for page incremental how do you know something is new (but not WAL logged) if there is no manifest? Is the plan to just recopy anything not WAL logged with each incremental? > Also, for external backups, there's no manifest... There certainly is a manifest for many external backup solutions. Not having a manifest is just running with scissors, backup-wise. Regards, -David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: