Re: WAL usage calculation patch
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 61b66de7-ebb3-fada-b6d3-243386976631@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL usage calculation patch (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Re: WAL usage calculation patch Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-04-07 04:12, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:01 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:01:30PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> I noticed in some of the screenshots that were tweeted that for example in >>> >>> WAL: records=1 bytes=56 >>> >>> there are two spaces between pieces of data. This doesn't match the rest of >>> the EXPLAIN output. Can that be adjusted? >> >> We talked about that here: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200402054120.GC14618%40telsasoft.com >> > > Yeah. Just to brief here, the main reason was that one of the fields > (full page writes) already had a single space and then we had prior > cases as mentioned in Justin's email [1] where we use two spaces which > lead us to decide using two spaces in this case. We also have existing cases for the other way: actual time=0.050..0.052 Buffers: shared hit=3 dirtied=1 The cases mentioned by Justin are not formatted in a key=value format, so it's not quite the same, but it also raises the question why they are not. Let's figure out a way to consolidate this without making up a third format. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: