Re: missing ML messages
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing ML messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 61E44C69.4050302@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing ML messages (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 01/16/22 11:34, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/61C09C1D.5050702@anastigmatix.net >>> *seeing that RFC 5322 3.6.4 permits more than one msg-id for in-reply-to, >>> crosses fingers to see what PGLister will make of it* > > A first step would probably be to figure out *what* to do. The RFC > basically appears to punt on the whole idea of what to do with > multiple parents. I'm unsure what would be the best thing for pglister > to do. Just pick the first entry and go with that? That would > certainly be the easiest, but would it be correct? I'm not sure whether the best metric is 'correct' or 'useful'. I think that on the one occasion where I jumped through the hoops of making my MUA produce a message with two in-reply-to IDs, it was in the hope that might allow future readers of either archive thread to find the message. Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: