Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 619.1282665994@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression
for FunctionScan
Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> If you try to put all that on the same line, I think it might get >> awkwardly long. Perhaps something like: >> Function Scan on function_name >> Expression: function_name(function_arg1, function_arg2, ...) > Yeah, that's what I had in mind, but I'm still fumbling for the right > label. "Expression" seems a bit too generic. How about "Function Call"? A moment's hacking later: regression=# explain verbose SELECT lv|| op|| rv FROM unnest(ARRAY[ ROW('1.2.2'::semver, '='::text, '1.2.2'::semver), ROW('1.2.23', '=', '1.2.23') ]) AS f(lv semver, op text, rv semver); QUERY PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Function Scanon pg_catalog.unnest f (cost=0.00..1.50 rows=100 width=96) Output: (((lv)::text || op) || (rv)::text) Function Call:unnest(ARRAY[ROW(('1.2.2'::text)::semver, '='::text, ('1.2.2'::text)::semver), ROW('1.2.23', '=', '1.2.23')]) (3 rows) Look reasonable? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: