Re: "REVOKE ... ON DATABASE template1 ..." has no effect
От | Gavin Flower |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "REVOKE ... ON DATABASE template1 ..." has no effect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6176194e-fd90-392a-7ff8-17a650abdc1f@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "REVOKE ... ON DATABASE template1 ..." has no effect (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 15/05/18 03:43, Tom Lane wrote: > Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de> writes: >> I would have expected a "REVOKE ALL ON DATABASE template1" to have the effect of >> changing the default permissions for new databases. > This is not a bug, and I don't think it's a reasonable expectation either. > There's certainly plenty of reasons why you might wish to lock people out > of template1, but that doesn't equate to supposing that people should be > locked out of every new database. Nor do we copy most other > database-level attributes when cloning a database (the exceptions are > things that affect the database contents, such as encoding). > > There might be an argument for extending ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES so that > it can control the initial default privileges for new databases. That's > certainly a feature request not a bug though. > > regards, tom lane > Would definitely agree with Tom on both points! Cheers, Gavin
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: