Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6135d0b7-3af9-d6fa-cdaa-990a2fc12147@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/10/22 14:28, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 04:39:11PM -0500, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 2/9/22 13:13, Nathan Bossart wrote: >>> I do wonder if users find the differences between predefined roles and role >>> attributes confusing. INHERIT doesn't govern role attributes, but it will >>> govern predefined roles when this patch is applied. Maybe the role >>> attribute system should eventually be deprecated in favor of using >>> predefined roles for everything. Or perhaps the predefined roles should be >>> converted to role attributes. >> >> Yep, I was suggesting that the latter would have been preferable to me while >> Robert seemed to prefer the former. Honestly I could be happy with either of >> those solutions, but as I alluded to that is probably a discussion for the >> next development cycle since I don't see us doing that big a change in this >> one. > > I agree. I still think Joshua's proposed patch is a worthwhile improvement > for v15. +1 I am planning to get into it in detail this weekend. So far I have really just ensured it merges cleanly and passes make world. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: