Re: Required locks for ANALYZE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Required locks for ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6129.1566310344@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Required locks for ANALYZE (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
RE: Required locks for ANALYZE
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > Therefore, in my opinion, the below paragraph should be amended as below. > * Before > ----- > ANALYZE requires only a read lock on the target table, so it can run in > parallel with other activity on the table. > ----- > * After > ----- > ANALYZE requires only a SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock on the target table, so > it can run in parallel with queries requiring ACCESS SHARE/ROW SHARE/ROW > EXCLUSIVE locks such as SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE, INSERT on the table. > ----- This does not really seem like an improvement. The second formulation is pedantically correct, but also unintelligible. Maybe we could make it say "run in parallel with non-DDL activity" ? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: