Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 611664c2-f715-72ca-865c-145fc6fe64d4@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: replay pause vs. standby promotion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/03/24 0:57, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On 2020/03/24 0:17, Sergei Kornilov wrote: >> Hello >> >>> You meant that the promotion request should cause the recovery >>> to finish immediately even if there are still outstanding WAL records, >>> and cause the standby to become the master? >> >> Oh, I get your point. But yes, I expect that in case of promotion request during a pause, the user (me too) will wantto have exactly the current state, not latest available in WALs. > > Basically I'd like the promotion to make the standby replay all the WAL > even if it's requested during pause state. OTOH I understand there > are use cases where immediate promotion is useful, as you explained. > So, +1 to add something like "pg_ctl promote -m immediate". > > But I'm afraid that now it's too late to add such feature into v13. > Probably it's an item for v14.... I pushed the latest version of the patch. If you have further opinion about immediate promotion, let's keep discussing that! Also we need to go back to the original patch posted at [1]. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/19168211580382043@myt5-b646bde4b8f3.qloud-c.yandex.net Regards, -- Fujii Masao NTT DATA CORPORATION Advanced Platform Technology Group Research and Development Headquarters
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: