Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6104.1203702840@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison
Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> IIRC we were speculating that data was being written >> in a pattern that required a lot of seeking thus ruining throughput, >> but we didn't have any hard evidence of that. Did you do the >> strace'ing I suggested? > Yes, I asked if you wanted counts or the whole output. You didn't > answer :). I provided the counts. Uh, sorry. Counts are useless here, we need to see the sequence of write locations to find out if there's a lot of nonconsecutive writes happening. BTW, the strace had better run across the whole PG process tree --- it's quite possible that there's some interaction between the bgwriter and the backend doing COPY, for instance. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: