Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)?
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60znh1ybtw.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)? (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
scott.marlowe@ihs.com ("scott.marlowe") writes: > TPF on a mainframe is highly recommended by Sabre, the Airline > reservation folks. Sure, but they have 17 mainframes in the "bunker" in Tulsa. And that seems more reflective of having Really Really Really Big Iron (the big boxes are BIG BOXES) than of it scaling across a bunch of cheaper hardware. Parts of that are multihosting applications; quite a number of those MFs are probably devoted to running the information systems for AMR. (I used to do work on some of the AMR-oriented MFs; mostly indirectly, from the Unix side...) Furthermore, a vast number of the projects since STIN was initially created at Sabre have been directed at replacing it. None have been notably successful. It looks a whole lot more like vertical scaling ("the biggest box with the mostest spindles and the mostest terminal interfaces") than anything else... -- output = reverse("ofni.smrytrebil" "@" "enworbbc") <http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/> Christopher Browne (416) 646 3304 x124 (land)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: