Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
От | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60vezda6zi.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? (Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |
Список | pgsql-general |
wes_williams@fcbonline.net ("Wes Williams") writes: > Perhaps I'm the only one to actually have read the article? > > Oracle 10g Express Edition HAS been available for free for development > purposes with the previously posted and reviewed limited licenses for quite > some time now. > > The news the zdnet.com article is reporting suggests Oracle WILL, by > years end, make the same software available for free - even in > production and commercial use. The Oracle 10g Express Edition is > still limited software by means of hardware resources available to > the database and a 4Gb [user] data file limit. And I daresay that this _can_ be an attractive thing to businesses, supposing they offer a "production release," gratis. There are plenty of "departmental applications" out there that involve limited amounts of data which can fit into the 4GB restriction. If Oracle provides a way to make it easy and cheap to deploy those, it can drive a fair bit of future Oracle business. The fact that it appears "a joke" to people wanting to deploy big databases doesn't prevent it from taking a painful bite out of, oh, say, certain vendors that forgot to own their own transactional storage engine... -- output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "cbbrowne.com") http://cbbrowne.com/info/languages.html Twice five syllables Plus seven can't say much but That's haiku for you.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: