Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60k773sidv.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
mascarm@mascari.com (Mike Mascari) writes: > Greg Stark wrote: >> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@libertyrms.info> writes: >>>VACUUM is like putting an extra few transport trucks onto the >>>highway. It may only go from one highway junction to the next, and >>>be fairly brief, if traffic is moving well. But if traffic is >>>heavy, it adds to the congestion. (And that's as far as the >>>analogy can go; I can't imagine a way of drawing the GUC parameter >>>into this...) >> >> Ooh strained metaphors. This game is always fun. >> >> So I think of it the other way around. A busy database is like >> downtown traffic with everyone going every which way for short >> trips. Running vacuum is like having a few trucks driving through >> your city streets for through traffic. >> >> Having a parameter to slow down the through traffic is like, uh, >> having express lanes for local traffic. er, yeah, that's the >> ticket. Except who ever heard of having express lanes for local >> traffic. Hm. > > All I know is that Jan Wieck would have each car filled to the brim > with spikes.... No, you just need _one_ spike. _One_ spike in the centre of the steering wheel. There would be _so_ much less tailgating if they had those spikes... -- "cbbrowne","@","libertyrms.info" <http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/> Christopher Browne (416) 646 3304 x124 (land)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: