Re: Online index builds
От | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online index builds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60hcw894n3.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Online index builds (was: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.2 Now Available) (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online index builds
|
Список | pgsql-general |
wmoran@collaborativefusion.com (Bill Moran) writes: > In response to Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>: > >> Bill Moran wrote: >> > In response to Josh Berkus <josh@postgresql.org>: >> > >> > > -- Online index builds >> > >> > I'm particularly curious about this feature. Does this mean that >> > PostgreSQL 8.2 can perform a REINDEX without blocking the relevant >> > table from writes? >> > >> > If so, the 8.2 docs are a bit out of date: >> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-reindex.html >> >> No, it means you can do CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY. >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-createindex.html > > Ahh ... and the text there specifically states that REINDEX does > _not_ work concurrently. > > Thanks. Let me add another question to this; this might possibly be worthy of a TODO for 8.3 or so... What if I wanted to: ALTER TABLE distributors ADD PRIMARY KEY CONCURRENTLY (dist_id); ? We have a number of cases where there isn't a true primary key on tables. It would be very attractive to have a non-blocking way of getting one, perhaps to be combined with letting Slony-I know about it... Or is it a better answer to look more deeply into the index configuration, creating a suitably named UNIQUE index on NOT NULL fields, and fiddling it into being the primary key? -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxfinances.info" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;; http://linuxfinances.info/info/advocacy.html "Marketing Division, Sirius Cybernetics Corp: A bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes." -- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: