Re: development environment of postgres
От | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: development environment of postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60hcvu370b.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | development environment of postgres (dakotali kasap <dakotalidavid@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: development environment of postgres
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
dakotalidavid@yahoo.com (dakotali kasap) writes: > I want to ask, which development environment should I use to add new > features to postgresql. Is Eclipse CDT (C/C++ Development Tool) > suitable for this, or are you using another environment, or just > using pico, vi, etc.? I can't speak for you. I find my competence is maximized when I'm using Emacs; others find other sets of tools preferable. The code doesn't care what tool you're best with. - There are people who will swear by vi + ctags. - There are some who still use QED. (Albeit not for this project...) <http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/qed.html> (Thesewould be extreme Unix partisans who think that the move from ed to vi was a Bad Thing... :-)) - Others prefer some form of Emacs. - One of my coworkers I think uses pico for most things; he's not keen on either of the typical Unix editors. As a quite wide-ranging rule, a worker who blames his tools for things not working tends to be *spectacularly* incompetent. If you pick tools you're not highly familiar with, you'll be liable to fall into that sort of problem :-(. Pick an editor you are intimately familiar with, and you'll be as well off as you can be. Your errors will be your own :-). -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; http://cbbrowne.com/info/sap.html `I am convinced that interactive systems will never displace batch systems for many applications.' - Brooks, _The Mythical Man-Month_ (And this does indeed seem true. MVS/CICS systems have *NOT* gone away...)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: