Re: PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007

bruce@momjian.us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>> > On 30 Aug 2007 at 10:02, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> >>> It also mentions PGCon Fall 2007 at that URL.  PGCon is not until
>> >>> spring 2008.
>> >> No it abbreviates PostgreSQL Conference to PGCon in the registration
>> >> form. That is all.
>> >
>> > PGCon is pretty well recognized as another existing conference.  I
>> > suggest another expression would be better suited.
>>
>> Not to be unkind, but you named your conference an obvious abbreviation.
>> Considering the audience we can expect that there will be no confusion
>> between the two.
>
> Drake's is going to be "The PGCon".  :-)

Is this "putting the 'con' into PgCon"?  :-)
--
"cbbrowne","@","acm.org"
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/
Why  are  they  called   buildings,  when  they're  already  finished?
Shouldn't they be called builts?