Re: Oracle vs PG
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle vs PG |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60e0bcc4-342c-ce57-c319-125eda75b13b@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle vs PG (Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1@aol.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle vs PG
Re: Oracle vs PG |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/23/18 1:47 PM, Ravi Krishna wrote: >> >> Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either >> side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon >> changed databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in >> either direction. > > I agree but this is the key: > > "Savepoints are an important database tool for tracking and recovering > individual transactions. On Prime Day, an excessive number of savepoints > was created, and Amazon's Aurora software wasn't able to handle the > pressure, slowing down the overall database performance, the report said." > > Again, pretty much content-free. For all you know some application was creating savepoints, needlessly: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-savepoint.html and not cleaning up after itself. The content is here: "Following the Prime Day outage, Amazon engineers filled out a 25-page report, which Amazon calls a correction of error. It's a standard process that Amazon uses to try to understand why a major incident took place and how to keep it from happening in the future." Not sure if that is publicly available or not, though my hunch is no. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: