Re: Background writer underemphasized ...
От | Chris Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Background writer underemphasized ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60abjtu1ww.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Background writer underemphasized ... (Marinos Yannikos <mjy@geizhals.at>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
mjy@geizhals.at (Marinos Yannikos) writes: > This helped with our configuration: > bgwriter_delay = 10000ms # 10-10000ms between rounds > bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 1000 # 0-1000 max buffers written/round FYI, I'd be inclined to reduce both of those numbers, as it should reduce the variability of behaviour. Rather than cleaning 1K pages every 10s, I would rather clean 100 pages every 1s, as that will have much the same effect, but spread the work more evenly. Or perhaps 10 pages every 100ms... Cut the delay *too* low and this might make the background writer, in effect, poll *too* often, and start chewing resources, but there's doubtless some "sweet spot" in between... -- "cbbrowne","@","cbbrowne.com" http://linuxdatabases.info/info/oses.html "For systems, the analogue of a face-lift is to add to the control graph an edge that creates a cycle, not just an additional node." -- Alan J. Perlis
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: