Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 609ab8e7-01c2-4b35-6824-7201b2bae434@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] New partitioning - some feedback
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/07/17 13:29, Amit Langote wrote: > > Someone complained about this awhile back [1]. And then it came up again > [2], where Noah appeared to take a stance that partitions should be > visible in views / output of commands that list "tables". > > Although I too tend to prefer not filling up the \d output space by > listing partitions (pg_class.relispartition = true relations), there > wasn't perhaps enough push for creating a patch for that. If some > committer is willing to consider such a patch, I can make one. > Yeah, me too (clearly). However if the consensus is that all these partition tables *must* be shown in \d output, then I'd be happy if they were identified as such rather than just 'table' (e.g 'partition table'). regards Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: