Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 607k48h12c.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | File Sytems Types and Os Recomendations ("John Allgood" <john@turbocorp.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
john@turbocorp.com ("John Allgood") writes: > I am looking for information on what operating systems and > filesystems people are running postgresql on. I have read so much on > this I decided to get some input from other people. I at first was > leaning toward FreeBSD and using its filesystem. We are a linux shop > and love it. What are thoughts on using ext3 or some other Linux > filesystems is there really that much performance difference by > using ext3 v/s BSD/FS/UFS. I did some update-heavy benchmarking recently, comparing Linux FSes, and found that of (ext3, XFS, JFS), the fastest one, by a moderate margin, was JFS. It was not unexpected that XFS and JFS were faster than ext3; what was a bit surprising was that JFS was quite a bit faster than XFS. The last I had heard, JFS was considered pretty slow as it hadn't been tuned too much; apparently that has changed. I didn't get around to testing FreeBSD with soft updates; the downside to that was, in my environment, and may also be, for you, that there was a lack of administrative familiarity. We have too many "heads exploding" from absorbing other things right now to be able to afford to throw in the learning curve of FreeBSD at this point in time. -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;; http://cbbrowne.com/info/nonrdbms.html "The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from. Furthermore, if you do not like any of them, you can just wait for next year's model." -- Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks"
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: