XA
| От | Chris Browne |
|---|---|
| Тема | XA |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6064slkhtu.fsf_-_@dba2.int.libertyrms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Fw: Announcing MySQL 5.0 Release Candidate ("Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: XA
Re: XA |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
josh@agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) writes: > Chris, > >> Two phase commit is a prerequisite for doing distributed transactions, >> and XA is a particular standard to which the 2PC support does not, at >> this point, conform. > > Eh? I was under the impression that XA was implemented in the JDBC > layer, not in the backend. There was an JDBC-based *attempt* at an XA handler; it wasn't fully functional, which essentially means it wasn't really XA. When the 2PC discussion was going on, it definitely came up in the discussion that this was a prerequisite to doing XA properly. It might not be forcibly necessary in the strictest sense, but 2PC is certainly one of the normal means for synchronizing distributed transactions... -- "cbbrowne","@","cbbrowne.com" http://cbbrowne.com/info/sgml.html "When people understand what Microsoft is up to, they're outraged." -- Tim O'Reilly, President, O'Reilly & Associates
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: