Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as
От | A.M. |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60568.216.41.12.254.1151515119.squirrel@webmail.webopticon.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys (mark@mark.mielke.cc) |
Ответы |
Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, June 28, 2006 1:14 pm, mark@mark.mielke.cc wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:39:16PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > >> Instead, I would like to humbly request the inclusion of a UUID >> datatype (or an opaque 128 bit datatype) in the core package. It's >> increasingly common and some databases (MS SQLServer) already have built >> in support for it. > > We have it. We're just not putting in the effort required to have it > included in core, as it's too much effort to convince people that the type > has value, that is is generic, and would be widely used without being > abused. All the geometric types that I'll never use in core, with few or > no uses, including functions to operate on these types, and no UUID > type... Hehe... To me, that's irony... :-) Is it on pgfoundry? From past discussions, the new criteria for getting something into core is to first determine if it is successful on pgfoundry.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: