Re: Sixth Draft

xzilla@users.sourceforge.net (Robert Treat) writes:
> I don't understand why people are not happy with just saying "it is
> the work of hundreds of developers" or some such paraphrase?  Why do
> we need to be more specific about the structure of the postgresql
> development community?

In the "long form" version, it provides some reassurance that:

 a) It's not some tiny clique vulnerable to the vagaries of one
    organization's business risks;

 b) It's not _controlled_ by one organization, either;

 c) It is also not some sort of anarchy that lets just anyone check in
     their favorite security holes.

For the pointy-haired types to whom "risk assessment" is everything,
these _are_ points of some importance.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/languages.html
For example, if errors are  detected in  one of  the disk drives,  the
system  will allow  read-only access to   memory until the  problem is
resolved.  This,  PE claimed,  prohibits   a damaged disk   drive from
entering errors into the system.  -- Computerworld 8 Nov 82 page 4.