Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: machine-readable pg_controldata? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 60489dd7d8ec786ec53e457addd83853@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: machine-readable pg_controldata? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > (FWIW, my recollection of the original design intention for > pg_controldata was that it was meant as a troubleshooting tool if the > database wouldn't start up. I'm somewhat bemused to hear that people > are trying to use it as part of production scripts. It wasn't meant to > produce machine-readable output, much less to give values that you could > rely on with respect to a running server.) I mostly use it to check on the progress of a PITR slave: just curious, is there a better/preferred way to get that information? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201003091016 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkuWZnAACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiqWgCglhHZ/awR5lSkjPG+yzd05ulz X6AAn0uvraweuz8pG15OybCyMzgfH3XX =QI2N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: