Re: [BUGS] BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6048.1450889093@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Haribabu Kommi > <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >>> That's neater. See for example the attached. >> Yes, it is much cleaner than the previous version. >> I reviewed and tested the same. It is working for all scenarios. > This patch has fallen in the void and it simplifies greatly vacuumdb.c > and its password-related routines. I have added it to the next CF to > not forget about it: Sorry for having lost track of this. I think if we're going to do this, we should do it now not later, because it essentially reverts the connectDatabase() API change made in 83dec5a71 in favor of a different API change with the same purpose. Now, that doesn't matter if no third-party code is using connectDatabase(), but I have a suspicion that there probably is some. Any such users will not thank us for whacking connectDatabase's API around in 9.5 and then whacking it around differently in 9.6. In short, I think we should apply this now and back-patch into 9.5, like the prior patch, even though we're post-RC1. The reduction in cross-version API churn is worth it. If no objections, I'll go do that shortly. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: