Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f071003231727k1642667dr75af056531b63da4@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: >> I wonder if this is simpler now that we got rid of the flat files stuff. >> We could validate the user once we've connected to a database and thus >> able to poke at the local user catalog, not just the global one. I >> think that was a serious roadblock. > > I think it'd be a mistake to invent a separate catalog for local users; > what had been nice clean foreign key relationships (eg, relowner -> > pg_auth.oid) would suddenly become a swamp. > > My first thought about a catalog representation would be to add a column > to pg_auth which is a DB OID for local users or zero for global users. > However, you'd probably want to prevent local users and global users > from having the same names, and it's not very clear how to do that > with this representation (though that'd be even worse with separate > catalogs). I guess we could fall back on a creation-time check (ick). Could we use a suitably defined exclusion constraint? ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: