Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f071003220802s4fae3ae9j672acecb77ddb06a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction as aspiring GSoC student) (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: access control jails (and introduction
as aspiring GSoC student)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: >> Sometimes it would be nice to conditionalize queries on a value other >> than the authenticated role. I really wish we had some kind of SQL >> variable support. Talking out of my rear end: > > I certainly agree- having variable support in the backend would > definitely be nice. I'd want it to be explicit and distinct from GUCs > though, unlike the situation we have w/ psql right now. Agreed. > All that said, > I'm not really a huge fan of write-your-own-authorization-system in > general. If the existing authorization system isn't sufficient for what > you want, then let's improve it. There may be specific cases where > what's needed is particularly complex, but that's what security definer > functions are for.. Fortunately this functionality also has other uses, so I don't know that we really need to decide which of those uses we approve of more or less. Does the SQL standard specify anything in this area? ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: