Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f071002201359i2af0d3b3r1ca69fdce371d159@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > David E. Wheeler wrote: >> On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> >> There is also the "must fix" issue with pg_regress. >> > >> > Why? My pg_regress runs just fine. If you are talking about 3rd party >> > modules, I suggested conditional Makefile rules. >> >> Because you can either make the simple change to pg_regress that >> David Fetter sent yesterday and have things continue to work, >> or you can break a slew of third-party module test suites (and >> possibly modules, as well) and make a lot of other people do a >> lot more work, not to mention email -hackers and ask WTF happened >> because they may well not know. >> >> I think that not changing pg_regress is more work for third-party >> module maintainers *and* more work for the Pg community when >> those maintainers come asking what happened and for advice on >> how to fix it. > > Well, I was asking why you labeled it "must fix" rather than "should > fix". I am fine with the pg_regress.c change. Yeah, if it makes life easier for other people, I say we go for it. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: