On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> I'm a bit inclined to commit the piece of this patch that concerns the
> warnings pragma, and leave the rest for the next release,
Based on the subsequent discussion on this thread, +1 for this
approach. Allowing use warnings sounds good; opening a potential
security hole sounds bad. Sounds like it would considerably simplify
the patch, too.
...Robert