Re: Sugerencia de opcion
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sugerencia de opcion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f071001240654t11884cc0kae1f0d1907c63e38@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Sugerencia de opcion ("Informatica-Cooperativa Cnel. Oviedo" <informatica@coopovie.com.py>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Sugerencia de opcion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2009/1/22 Informatica-Cooperativa Cnel. Oviedo <informatica@coopovie.com.py>: > Buenos Dias todos, > > Soy un usuario de postgres de Paraguay, consulto > sobre la posibilidad de inclucion en la futura version la siguiente > sentencia(Uso de alias en la condicion HAVING ): > > > SELECT id, sum(salario) as SumaSalario > FROM salarios > GROUP BY id > HAVING SumaSalario>500; I've wished for that syntax once or twice myself, but I'm assuming there's a reason we haven't implemented it? Part of the problem is it's inheritantly ambiguous if salarios happens to contain a column called sumasalario, which is a problem that seems to arise for me fairly regularly in practice. Still, it would be nice for WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING clauses to have an explicit way to reference "the target list column called foo". ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: