Re: Automatic optimization of IN clauses via INNER JOIN
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Automatic optimization of IN clauses via INNER JOIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070912181622l2d74d0cdq94390eb1b1911729@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Automatic optimization of IN clauses via INNER JOIN (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Automatic optimization of IN clauses via INNER JOIN
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
2009/12/18 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>: > 2009/12/18 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>: >> 2009/12/18 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>: >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> NOT IN is the only that really kills you as far as optimization is >>>> concerned. IN can be transformed to a join. NOT IN forces a NOT >>>> (subplan)-type plan, which bites - hard. >>> >>> in a well designed database (read: not abusing NULLs) - it can be done >>> with joins too. >> >> But not by PostgreSQL, or so I believe. > > using left join ? If at least one column in the subselect is strict, you can rewrite it that way yourself, but the optimizer won't do it. I wish it did, but I don't wish it badly enough to have written the code myself, and apparently neither does anyone else. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: