Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070912170616q4edca247qf49990550c148ad@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2009/12/17 Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>: > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009/12/16 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>: >> >>>> ? ?long desc: When turned on, privilege checks on large objects perform with >> >>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? backward compatibility as 8.4.x or earlier releases. > >> Mostly English quality, but there are some other issues too. Proposed >> patch attached. > > I remember we had discussions about the version number, like > "Don't use '8.5' because it might be released as '9.0'", no? I chose to follow the style which Tom indicated that he preferred here. We don't use the phrase "8.4.x series" anywhere else in the documentation, so this doesn't seem like a good time to start. Tom or I will go through and renumber everything if we end up renaming the release to 9.0. > Another comment is I'd like to keep <link linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject-metadata"> > for the first <structname>pg_largeobject</structname> in each topic. Those two things aren't the same. Perhaps you meant <link linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject">? I'll tweak the pg_largeobject and pg_largeobject_metadata sections to make sure each has a link to the other and commit this. I also found one more spelling mistake so I will include that correction as well. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: