Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070912111012w6e9b38cejeaa809acb7aa7a06@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@sun.com> wrote: > We know that performance impact is less then 1% probably less then 0.6%. > The question is if it is acceptable or not. I personally think that it > is acceptable. However if not, I will start work on backup solution with > dtraced AllocSet and some switching mechanism. But it needs little > discussion about design. And first we need decision about current > performance impact. As far as I am concerned that is way too much, particularly considering that your test case isn't designed to be particularly memory-allocation intensive, and if it is up to me I will reject this.Even a quarter-percent slowdown for a feature thatwill be used only by a small fraction of users only a small fraction of time time seems totally unacceptable to me. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: