Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 603c8f070912100753o61722638y92671d099d8a3a00@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> >> I don't think IO is a terrible name for an option but I like BUFFERS >> better. I don't think the BUFFERS/BLOCKS confusion is too bad, but >> perhaps we could use BUFFERS in both places. > > I don't know how "blocks" got into here in the first place--this concept is > "buffers" just about everywhere else already, right? I think we have some places already in the system where we bounce back and forth between those terms. I expect that's the reason. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: