On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Caleb Welton <cwelton@greenplum.com> writes:
>> I believe the int2vectorin function should handle invalid input more cleanly.
>
> Why bother? Under what circumstances would users (or anyone at all)
> be putting data into an int2vector? It's an internal type and is
> certainly not meant for use in user tables.
Maybe it's just me, but this seems like an unnecessarily dismissive
response to a report of some rather odd-looking behavior.
...Robert