Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070911161009v70d89909r42706e1383c12a5a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? (cb <cb@mythtech.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:14 PM, cb <cb@mythtech.net> wrote: > I've got a pair of servers running PostgreSQL 8.0.4 on Windows. We have > several tables that add and delete massive amounts of data in a single day > and are increasingly having a problem with drive fragmentation and it > appears to be giving us a decent performance hit. This is external > fragmentation we are dealing with. We already vacuum the tables on a regular > basis to reduce internal fragmentation as best as possible. > > Currently I shut down the PostgreSQL service every few weeks and manually > run a defragment of the drive, but this is getting tedious. Diskeeper has an > Automatic Mode that runs in the background all the time to handle this for > me. They advertise they are compatible with MS SQL server, but don't appear > to have any specific info on PostgreSQL. > > I'm curious if anyone else has used Diskeeper's Automatic Mode in > combination with PostgreSQL to defrag and keep the drive defragged while > PostgreSQL is actually running. > > Thanks! > > -chris > <www.mythtech.net> I'm not sure what the answer is to your actual question, but I'd highly recommend upgrading to 8.3 or 8.4. The performance is likely to be a lot better, and 8.0/8.1 are no longer supported on Windows. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: