Re: plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070910230716j347f6521i1b40d8a8f86dac9b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND
Re: plpgsql EXECUTE will not set FOUND |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: >> I'll go search for more, meantime I'll just add the main goal of this >> new thread is to have -hackers know there is a real user demand for >> having EXECUTE set FOUND the same way it sets GET DIAGNOSTIC. > > [shrug...] There is also real user demand for not silently breaking > code that works now, which is what we risk anytime we change the set > of statements that can set FOUND. We've had this discussion before and I'm still unpersuaded by your position. I *never* write "IF FOUND THEN" except immediately after the statement where I expect that variable to be set, and I submit that anyone who who does write code that relies on certain statements not setting FOUND is, IMO, depending on a bug. We don't and shouldn't have a policy of making future PostgreSQL releases bug-compatible with previous releases. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: