Re: vacuumdb error
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuumdb error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070910160632t66723f25ma09182e8ed85025e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuumdb error (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuumdb error
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Thom Brown wrote: >> This is either a bug in vacuumdb with it not using the correct order, >> or postgres shouldn't be paying attention to the order of the >> keywords. =A0In any case, it doesn't work. =A0I've searched the postgres >> FAQs, TODO and mailing list archives, but can't find a mention of >> this. > > Thanks, fixed. We had the same bug with FREEZE and ANALYZE combination, > which was fixed in April, but the order between FREEZE and VERBOSE was > still incorrect. The fact that this is order-sensitive is just a trap for the unwary anyway. I wonder if we ought to implement a flexible options syntax like we did for EXPLAIN and COPY, though since I don't know of any new options that are needed here maybe it's not worth it. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: