Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070909300951x106f0fd2kc1aba18e1b82f56@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: >> Robert Haas wrote: >>> - There is one dblink pach left over from last CommitFest. Joe Conway >>> was going to review it the weekend of July 18th-19th, but that didn't >>> end up happening and so that patch is still waiting. We might be able >>> to find someone else to review it, but I'm not sure whether that will >>> help unless there is a committer other than Joe with bandwidth to do >>> the final review and commit. > >> I will get to it before the end of this commitfest, but I have to admit >> I'm not all that excited about this patch in the first place. I don't >> know that I agree with the need. > > Well, you're the dblink expert. If you think it should be rejected > I doubt many of us will argue with you. Yep. CommitFest doesn't mean "commit it"; it means "decide whether to commit it". Things being rejected or returned with feedback for further improvement is fine; we're just trying to avoid long periods with no response at all. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: