Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070909270951m176e86a3wc8adf589b0addd28@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Is there another patch you'd like me to work on? > > Lock wait statistics says it needs review, but the last comment > suggests it is waiting on author. It looks like there is one outstanding TODO item, but it doesn't seem to be a very big one, so I think that would be an excellent choice. > Enhancements to COPY (error logging and autopartitioning) says it is > waiting on author but last comment suggests perhaps it is ready for > review. Good catch, fixed. > So I think I need some guidance on what I should be doing. Go for lock wait stats. As a side note, what we really need to focus on at this point in the CommitFest is getting closure. If you have reviewed a patch and a new version has been posted, please check whether it looks good and if so mark the patch Ready for Committer. If you have reviewed a patch and a new version has NOT been posted for 4-5 days, post a note saying that you are marking the patch Returned with Feedback and do so. The CommitFest will be half over in 48 hours and we have only closed 19 of 48 patches - that is not good. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: