Re: \d+ for long view definitions?

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 8/31/09 1:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I guess my premise is that if I use \d, I'm primarily interested in the
>> column names and types.  The view definition is secondary.  If the view
>> definition is a single line or uses a single table, it's interesting
>> because it might describe something about the schema design, but if it's
>> 20 lines it's an implementation detail.
>
> I agree with Peter here.

I think we should always or never show the view definition, not sometimes.

And I also agree with Tom's point that we should fix the pager.  The
way that it works now is really annoying.

...Robert